Trump now held in contempt of court

scook said:
You’re just really into lying aren’t you? I have never claimed that all legal challenges to Trump are biased or unfair, I’m pointing out that you are quick to believe they are all fair and pronounce his guilt, at least by insinuation. I think most of them probably are biased and unfair, having observer the unceasing attacks on him, which you hypocritically deny, primarily by ignoring all proven supporting facts.

You may not be 100% ignorant of court function, but you’ve shown no evidence of understanding of it.

There’s nothing funny about your extreme bias in a time of such deep, destructive division, and your snarky deflection with your “that’s funny” and your “hahahahaha’s” are frankly disgusting.
Click to expand...

Oh you think MOST of the legal challenges trump faces are biased and unfair .
Guess how many times trumps been sued as compared to Obama and Biden ?

You think my posting the words “ funny and hahaha” are disgusting ?
I think forcing women to birth babies from rape and incest is disgusting !
Your priorities and perceptions are “ funny”
 
bgreene said:
Oh you think MOST of the legal challenges trump faces are biased and unfair .
Guess how many times trumps been sued as compared to Obama and Biden ?

You think my posting the words ***8220; funny and hahaha***8221; are disgusting ?
I think forcing women to birth babies from rape and incest is disgusting !
Your priorities and perceptions are ***8220; funny***8221;
Click to expand...

To answer your questions:

1) Yes, I think that most of the legal challenges that Trump faces are biased and unfair. I think they are just part of the never ending quest by the Democrats to prevent Trump, by whatever means possible, from running again in 2024.

2) No one is forcing ANY woman to birth babies that were conceived from rape or incest. Some states permit abortions in that case, some don't. But most blue states, including the one we live in are available. In fact, Murphy was on TV this morning stating that he's made it possible for women, even from out of state, to have free abortions in NJ, paid for by the taxpayers. So we now live in a state where murder is not only condoned, it's paid for.

.
 
scook said:
You’re just really into lying aren’t you? I have never claimed that all legal challenges to Trump are biased or unfair, I’m pointing out that you are quick to believe they are all fair and pronounce his guilt, at least by insinuation. I think most of them probably are biased and unfair, having observer the unceasing attacks on him, which you hypocritically deny, primarily by ignoring all proven supporting facts.

You may not be 100% ignorant of court function, but you’ve shown no evidence of understanding of it.

There’s nothing funny about your extreme bias in a time of such deep, destructive division, and your snarky deflection with your “that’s funny” and your “hahahahaha’s” are frankly disgusting.
Click to expand...

Destroyer said:
To answer your questions:

1) Yes, I think that most of the legal challenges that Trump faces are biased and unfair. I think they are just part of the never ending quest by the Democrats to prevent Trump, by whatever means possible, from running again in 2024.

2) No one is forcing ANY woman to birth babies that were conceived from rape or incest. Some states permit abortions in that case, some don't. But most blue states, including the one we live in are available. In fact, Murphy was on TV this morning stating that he's made it possible for women, even from out of state, to have free abortions in NJ, paid for by the taxpayers. So we now live in a state where murder is not only condoned, it's paid for.

.
Click to expand...

Not yet destroyer - but as you know overturning Roe WILL ALLOW states these disgusting regulations. 26 states will make abortion illegal - 17 will make it illegal in rape and incest.
Sick !
 
So, by all means, let's ignore the Constitution when it serves your agenda. While we're at it, let's interpret it to allow for offing poor old grandpa when he becomes inconvenient.
 
scook said:
So, by all means, let's ignore the Constitution when it serves your agenda. While we're at it, let's interpret it to allow for offing poor old grandpa when he becomes inconvenient.
Click to expand...

You’re WRONG as usual scook ….

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.
 
But when the Supreme Court finds that the decision was in error and was bad law (completely unrelated how many people approved or disapproved of the policy, or the policy itself), now it’s what, unconstitutional?

You support the policy and I, for the most part, don’t. I think that, like anyone, a woman has a right to self defense, so no question that if the pregnancy threatens death or serious health problems, it can be terminated. I understand rape and incest, though still lament the ending of a human life. I don’t support murdering babies because they’re inconvenient.
 
scook said:
But when the Supreme Court finds that the decision was in error and was bad law (completely unrelated how many people approved or disapproved of the policy, or the policy itself), now it’s what, unconstitutional?

You support the policy and I, for the most part, don’t. I think that, like anyone, a woman has a right to self defense, so no question that if the pregnancy threatens death or serious health problems, it can be terminated. I understand rape and incest, though still lament the ending of a human life. I don’t support murdering babies because they’re inconvenient.
Click to expand...

Oh you “ understand rape and incest “ well isn’t that generous of you.
Tell you what - you get raped by some guy and let’s say men could get pregnant and see how anxious you are to have it .
Men making laws about women ……and the murdering babies bit doesn’t line up with a group of cells with no heart or brain formed yet .
 
Another disingenuous response. Yes, I understand rape and incest, but still lament the ending of a life.

You know very well that under the lay you support, fully viable babies have been partially delivered and had their spinal columns snipped to kill them. That’s murder and it’s despicable.
 
scook said:
Another disingenuous response. Yes, I understand rape and incest, but still lament the ending of a life.

You know very well that under the lay you support, fully viable babies have been partially delivered and had their spinal columns snipped to kill them. That’s murder and it’s despicable.
Click to expand...

Oh you “ understand “ but won’t come out against it
 
If you’re so concerned about the subject of the thread being the simple fact that Trump has been held in contempt, you should probably stay on that subject yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top