Trump now held in contempt of court

Destroyer said:
Might I remind you that when HRC lost to President Trump there was no national mail in balloting, which became a huge opportunity for the Democrats to indulge in the illegal practice of ballot harvesting which they did to great effect.

.
Click to expand...

“ ballot harvesting “ claims destroyer - another proven false .
 
bgreene said:
“ ballot harvesting “ claims destroyer - another proven false .
Click to expand...

Actually, it's been proven with videos on YouTube where you can see a woman signing the ballots, then dropping them into a mailbox, then going back to her car and signing a bunch more and putting them in the box, over and over. Additionally there were over 140,000 irregularities in ballots in one state that all seemed to be magically in Biden's favor. (That's still be tracked, since they know the name of the person they think did it).

.
 
Destroyer said:
Actually, it's been proven with videos on YouTube where you can see a woman signing the ballots, then dropping them into a mailbox, then going back to her car and signing a bunch more and putting them in the box, over and over. Additionally there were over 140,000 irregularities in ballots in one state that all seemed to be magically in Biden's favor. (That's still be tracked, since they know the name of the person they think did it).

.
Click to expand...

More nonsense - trump lost by over 8 MILLION POPULAR VOTES and he lost the electoral too
 
Your “traitor” accusation is also getting pretty boring and tiresome.

Someone who is in danger of being killed who leaves one of their own behind enemy lines, might be called a coward - someone who leaves a great number of his own behind enemy lines when there isn’t the least bit of danger to himself, only the possibility of political advantage, pandering to his base, is absolutely a traitor. Biden is a traitor, Trump, not so much.
 
scook said:
Your “traitor” accusation is also getting pretty boring and tiresome.

Someone who is in danger of being killed who leaves one of their own behind enemy lines, might be called a coward - someone who leaves a great number of his own behind enemy lines when there isn’t the least bit of danger to himself, only the possibility of political advantage, pandering to his base, is absolutely a traitor. Biden is a traitor, Trump, not so much.
Click to expand...

If you’re bored stop posting. TRUTH however is you likely enjoy the discourse - proven by virtue of your continued posts.

Trumps a traitor for his role in the Jan 6, 2021 insurrection attempt.
And …..for other lessor offenses.
 
I enjoy discourse and have repeatedly encouraged you to engage in it. What you write could hardly be called discourse by anyone who understands the meaning of the word.

Trump’s “involvement” in Nov 6, as described by you is very definitely opinion, and alleging undefined lesser offenses as traitorous is pretty weak. As a point of clarification, “lessor” offenses, as you wrote, would be offenses committed by someone “leasing” property.

It doesn’t look like you’ll be able to control yourself and quit posting your far left talking points, but there will probably be someone here to refute them as you do.
 
scook said:
I enjoy discourse and have repeatedly encouraged you to engage in it. What you write could hardly be called discourse by anyone who understands the meaning of the word.

Trump’s “involvement” in Nov 6, as described by you is very definitely opinion, and alleging undefined lesser offenses as traitorous is pretty weak. As a point of clarification, “lessor” offenses, as you wrote, would be offenses committed by someone “leasing” property.

It doesn’t look like you’ll be able to control yourself and quit posting your far left talking points, but there will probably be someone here to refute them as you do.
Click to expand...


" alleged " claims scook..... record shows Trump was " begged " to speak up against his violent mob.
And of course your endless insults.......
 
Well, there’s very little in common between your constant snarky, childish attempts at insults and replies that are honest, accurate descriptions of your behavior.

You repeat well worn left wing media and democrat talking points with no evidence that you’ve applied any critical thinking in the process.
 
bgreene said:
This threads about the FACT that Trumps held in contempt of court and his attempt at avoidance denied .
Click to expand...

And once again, when a comment hit's home, the topic magically changes back to the original topic. In other words, once again an avoidance of the previous comment.

.
 
If it is about Trump being held in contempt, a part of normal legal process, then is is also about normal and customary legal process, where a ruling can be appealed.

Your confirmation bias doesn't allow you to withhold your opinion until the situation is adjudicated. You WANT to believe anything negative about Trump, so you can't control your gleeful reporting of the "fact" that he's guilty of all manner of things and is therefor "avoiding" his punishment.
 
scook said:
If it is about Trump being held in contempt, a part of normal legal process, then is is also about normal and customary legal process, where a ruling can be appealed.

Your confirmation bias doesn't allow you to withhold your opinion until the situation is adjudicated. You WANT to believe anything negative about Trump, so you can't control your gleeful reporting of the "fact" that he's guilty of all manner of things and is therefor "avoiding" his punishment.
Click to expand...

Wrong - just the facts scookie , just the facts
 
The facts are as I stated them. If your understanding of the legal system is as limited as you demonstrate, you shouldn’t be starting a thread like this.
 
If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.
 
scook said:
If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.
Click to expand...

The proven and obviously guilty are guilty scook - Democrat or Republican .
 
Well, since it’s not proven until a court rules and then is subject to error on the part of the court, you are allowing your EXTREME confirmation bias the convict in your mind - only. Once again, completely unconcerned about the obviously guilty democrats - obvious through observation of their public behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top