Scook - this thread is about the FACT that judge held Trump in contempt of court AND REJECTED his appeal. This is NOT a bias ….just a FACT.
Trump now held in contempt of court
- Thread starter bgreene
- Start date
Scook - this thread is about the FACT that judge held Trump in contempt of court AND REJECTED his appeal. This is NOT a bias ….just a FACT.
Scook - the judge held trump on contempt of court and denied his appeal.
It’s just what happened . Not an opinion just a fact.
It’s the news and fact scook - you don’t like it that’s your problem .
How you think I “ feel about it “ is irrelevant to the FACT.
But it’s the FACT . Trump held in contempt of court and his appeal denied.
Destroyer
God
I believe an appeal has been filed to a higher court and everything is on hold pending the outcome of that appeal.
.
The higher court REJECTED Trumps appeal - it’s not on “ hold “
Try checking before making a claim…..
https://abc7ny.com/donald-trump-contempt-appeal-letitia-james-appellate-division/11815097/
Destroyer
God
Interesting. So even though Trump and his company have produced literally millions of pages of documents, the racist judge still wants more. And the Appellate Judge denied Trumps appeal, so the witch hunt goes on. I hope that Trumps suit against the judge is successful and he takes her for all she has. Meanwhile, I guess we'll all have to wait until the next installment of this soap opera.
As for my checking, I was correct. Trump DID file an appeal to a higher court exactly as I claimed. I was not aware that it had been rejected.
.
The SPECIFIC documents requested were NOT provided by trump .
That’s WHY he was held in contempt of court and that’s WHY higher court rejected his appeal.
Destroyer
God
They said they do not believe him when he said he does not have the documents. So this is really about who you believe, or perhaps a way to make Trump look bad by asking for something they already know that he doesn't have.
Perhaps you believe in magic. I believe it's impossible to produce something that you do not possess. I wonder what those requested missing documents contain.
.
Court holds Trump in contempt . That’s the status .
Judge lifts Trump contempt of court ruling - with contingencies .
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/politics/donald-trump-new-york-judge-civil-contempt/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/politics/donald-trump-new-york-judge-civil-contempt/index.html
Destroyer
God
Yep. one of them being that Trump has to pay $110,000 in accumulated fines. Personally it smacks of legal extorsion by the court to me, but that's just my opinion. Time will tell as this witch hunt plays out.
.
Of course the key document are “ not available “ from Trump .
Now trying to get the documents Trump took to Florida.
Good luck - likely he had all cheating related paperwork shredded.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/12/politics/trump-documents-mar-a-lago/index.html
Good luck - likely he had all cheating related paperwork shredded.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/12/politics/trump-documents-mar-a-lago/index.html
Destroyer
God
More opinion with zero factual evidence. What IS factual is that Trump has already provided over one million pages of documents to that kangaroo court. I would tend to think if he had the documents (whatever they are) he would have provided them also. If the court thinks that the National Archives has the documents why didn't they just subpoena them in the beginning instead of making Trump look for them and pay that fine? (or maybe the whole idea was to make trump look bad and pay money?)
.
That’s your opinion - the law and the judge says otherwise
scook
God
The “law” doesn’t “say” anything. It’s something judges or juries “apply” in decisions.
If you had any actual experience with the court system, you would know that judges and juries often err. Sometimes, it’s due to incompetence, prejudice or outright dishonesty of the judge, sometimes due to buying the lies of a clever lawyer - I’m this case, it seems likely that the judge is prejudiced. In any case, you claim certainty, heavily imputing guilt to Trump, when you are probably 100% ignorant of the facts of the case.
If you had any actual experience with the court system, you would know that judges and juries often err. Sometimes, it’s due to incompetence, prejudice or outright dishonesty of the judge, sometimes due to buying the lies of a clever lawyer - I’m this case, it seems likely that the judge is prejudiced. In any case, you claim certainty, heavily imputing guilt to Trump, when you are probably 100% ignorant of the facts of the case.
You claim all legal challenges to trump are either biased or unfair .
You claim I’m probably 100 % ignorant to the facts.
And you write about “ bias”. That’s ……funny !
scook
God
You’re just really into lying aren’t you? I have never claimed that all legal challenges to Trump are biased or unfair, I’m pointing out that you are quick to believe they are all fair and pronounce his guilt, at least by insinuation. I think most of them probably are biased and unfair, having observer the unceasing attacks on him, which you hypocritically deny, primarily by ignoring all proven supporting facts.
You may not be 100% ignorant of court function, but you’ve shown no evidence of understanding of it.
There’s nothing funny about your extreme bias in a time of such deep, destructive division, and your snarky deflection with your “that’s funny” and your “hahahahaha’s” are frankly disgusting.
You may not be 100% ignorant of court function, but you’ve shown no evidence of understanding of it.
There’s nothing funny about your extreme bias in a time of such deep, destructive division, and your snarky deflection with your “that’s funny” and your “hahahahaha’s” are frankly disgusting.