smokeonthewater
God
Not me... I like the 4 cyl plan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aussie, you're doing what i always wanted to do with my old room mates Stingray 176(had the 3.7L 165 hp), more power to you for doing it, but just don't over complicate it
what he said. Nothing against the 3.7l, and i think mercruiser screwed up by ditching it for the 4.3l v6. But i agree that your over complicating it many ways. Build the bottem end up, put a good head on it, call a good cam company and have them see if they can do a regrind to peak the engine for your application, and call it a day. Electric water pumps and other extravagant things on a boat are just head aches waiting to happen. Build the engine up, but keep it simple.
I forgot another reason im keeping the 3.7 a few members told me that they make good power for what they are and I only took the boat for one short run and had the push rod problem so I couldn't tell how good it wasI guess a lot of you guys are thinking why am i wasting my time and money on a small 3.7 when i can drop a V8 in my V and have all the power i want here are a few reasons why i haven't gone that way
( 1 ) prices for a S/H V8 boat engine are too expensive here
( 2 ) don't wont the extra weight
Reasons why i stuck with the 3.7
( 1 ) the light weight of the engine and even more with the alloy head
( 2 ) engine parts being cheap because same as a 460
( 3 ) fuel efficient
( 4 ) Most of all being a unique engine having a smaller engine making
good power is more rewarding than dropping a V8 in it when i do go
out for a fish and my boat is more fuel efficient than my mates boats
its a fishing boat and will be well balanced with the 3.7
:money: