“ punching above my weight “ says scook as he poses as both judge and know it all.
Hahah go have a cookie - scookie
Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice
- Thread starter bgreene
- Start date
“ punching above my weight “ says scook as he poses as both judge and know it all.
Hahah go have a cookie - scookie
Destroyer
God
You should have a cookie too destroyer and a glass of milk
Hah ….destroyer once again “ posing “ as Gentleman of this web site . Funny ! Hypocrite !
And of course - my encouraging scookie to have a cookie doesn’t compare to your posting history destroyer !!!
You should have a cookie too ! So funny are your silly posts .
Scookie - I’m not a great athlete …but I’m not clumsy either as you write associated with your non stop insults . Hahah.
Roe- Wade: supported to STAY as FEDERAL LAW by the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS .
That’s a FACT. Same as most all I post . FACTS and the TRUTH.
Destroyer
God
I ASKED you to stop with the insults.
I'll make a deal with you. You show me where in the Constitution that it says that a woman, as protected by the Constitution, (As Roe V Wade claims) has the right to an abortion and I'll admit I was wrong and you were right. Deal?
However, if you cannot show me where it says that then you have to admit you were wrong and that I was right. OK?
.
There was no INSULT from me in my last post where you claim .
You just write that PRETENDING there was an insult .
Destroyer
God
I don't "pretend" anything.
And I notice you haven't responded to my offer for a deal. Remember, this thread is about Roe V Wade and a woman's right to kill a baby.
.
1. There was no INSULT from me in my last post where you claim .
You just write that PRETENDING there was an insult .
2. Based on YOUR posting history, I’m not interested in any “ deal “ with you.
My interest is posting the FACTS and TRUTHS……which, I do .
Destroyer
God
So in other words you know I'm right about Roe v Wade.
My previous posting history? I'm not sure I even know what that means. Would you care to explain?
Your comment about my previous posting history is nothing but a smoke screen. Nice try.
And again, as I've said many times before, I do not pretend anything.
.
Majority of Americans support Roe-Wade . Trumps court appointees want to override the Will of the People.
scook
God
“Trump’s” appointees want to properly rule on what the constitution says, rather than legislating from the bench. If a majority is really in favor of killing babies under all conditions, as a matter of convenience, they can elect representatives who will pass a law to that effect.
It’s a policy issue that should be a subject of law, then vetted by the courts when lawsuits are filed. That’s the constitutional process.
It’s a policy issue that should be a subject of law, then vetted by the courts when lawsuits are filed. That’s the constitutional process.
More nonsense and excuses
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction
LAW OF OUR LAND
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.
Three conservative justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony M. Kennedy and David H. Souter co-authored the court's main opinion in the 5-4 decision, writing:
"The woman's right to terminate her pregnancy before viability is the most central principle of Roe vs. Wade. It is a rule of law and a component of liberty we cannot renounce.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.
Three conservative justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony M. Kennedy and David H. Souter co-authored the court's main opinion in the 5-4 decision, writing:
"The woman's right to terminate her pregnancy before viability is the most central principle of Roe vs. Wade. It is a rule of law and a component of liberty we cannot renounce.
26 states will make abortion illegal if Roe is overturned .
16 of those states would also make abortion illegal including rape and incest.
Disgusting that politicians to decide what a woman, a family, and their doctors cannot do in the case of these decisions.
I am pro choice, I support upholding Rowe-Wade.
16 of those states would also make abortion illegal including rape and incest.
Disgusting that politicians to decide what a woman, a family, and their doctors cannot do in the case of these decisions.
I am pro choice, I support upholding Rowe-Wade.