Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice

Ok, so what is it WITH a heartbeat and a brain? When, in your opinion, is it a baby? When (morally) does it become murder?

.

I really don’t know. I think most every woman is “pro life “ they just need to have the choice.
Who are men to force these rules ? Men that wouldn’t adopt the baby these women would be forced to have .
And it IS mainly MEN trying to repeal this law. Rich folks will still get abortions - the poor will be forced otherwise .

I’m not in favor of forcing the “moral question” on women in this regard . Women don’t go through the awful experience of an abortion for fun.
 
I really don’t know. I think most every woman is “pro life “ they just need to have the choice.
Who are men to force these rules ? Men that wouldn’t adopt the baby these women would be forced to have .
And it IS mainly MEN trying to repeal this law. Rich folks will still get abortions - the poor will be forced otherwise .

I’m not in favor of forcing the “moral question” on women in this regard . Women don’t go through the awful experience of an abortion for fun.

That's a pretty honest answer (the "I don't know")

But 62 million women were not pro life since RvW.

And even if RvW is repealed, states still have the right to either allow or ban abortions. So women will still have a shoice in most cases.

.
 
That's a pretty honest answer (the "I don't know")

But 62 million women were not pro life since RvW.

And even if RvW is repealed, states still have the right to either allow or ban abortions. So women will still have a shoice in most cases.

.

The MAJORITY of Americans are pro choice.
The MAJORITY of Americans vote against opening our prestige Arctic Wilderness Zone to oil and gas drilling.
Neither means our politicians follow the will of the people !
 
Always trying to deny and switch

LOL You're the one that just brought up something about opening our prestige Arctic Wilderness Zone to oil and gas drilling in a Roe v Wade post. You should be the LAST person to talk about switching subjects.

Sorry Pipe, Didn't mean to steal your thunder, I just had to answer since he does this all the time.

.
 
LOL You're the one that just brought up something about opening our prestige Arctic Wilderness Zone to oil and gas drilling in a Roe v Wade post. You should be the LAST person to talk about switching subjects.

Sorry Pipe, Didn't mean to steal your thunder, I just had to answer since he does this all the time.

.

All the time says destroyer -
wrong as usual.

PUBLIC OPINION references to show how our government tries to force their agenda against the will of Americans.
My additional example is ON topic.
So the MAJORITY of Americans are PRO CHOICE.
 
That may be - polls seems split on it but if so , likely because many Americans dont know whats actually in the plan.
The abortion question is obvious.

I'm a little confused by your statement. Exactly what in the abortion question is obvious?

.
 
I’m pro choice .
Play your sentence structure games and pretend you can’t understand.


You said:
That may be - polls seems split on it but if so , likely because many Americans dont know whats actually in the plan.
The abortion question is obvious.
Which is why I asked you what was obvious, since you did not clarify what, exactly, you thought was obvious. Now, with your post saying that you are pro-choice we all can better understand what you were saying. Thank you for clarifying your statement.

One other point. I do not play games Greene. You don't seem to understand that.
When you make outlandish statements with no proof to back them up, or when you are caught in a false statement (like the Fox tree burning for example) and you won't admit that you are wrong I will call you out on it in this forum.
When you are correct in a statement (like Liz Cheney releasing those texts) I will agree with you like I did.
It's really very simple.

.
 
You said:
Which is why I asked you what was obvious, since you did not clarify what, exactly, you thought was obvious. Now, with your post saying that you are pro-choice we all can better understand what you were saying. Thank you for clarifying your statement.

One other point. I do not play games Greene. You don't seem to understand that.
When you make outlandish statements with no proof to back them up, or when you are caught in a false statement (like the Fox tree burning for example) and you won't admit that you are wrong I will call you out on it in this forum.
When you are correct in a statement (like Liz Cheney releasing those texts) I will agree with you like I did.
It's really very simple.

.


What I understand is also clear - I’m FACT based .
Like trump lost the election - FACT
That Trump lies by claiming he won by wide margin - a LIE and FACT
That the majority of Americans are pro choice - FACT

Your constant pursuit to discredit me is really because you prefer not to face the truth and facts. Rather you write elaborate “ opinion pieces “ .
 
Back
Top