Trump lies about Ketanji Brown Jackson

[Destroyer]

Brown was avoiding the trap .
Defining what a woman is ? Perhaps the real answer is chromosomal .
How do you define a woman ? By body parts alone ?

How in the world could that be a trap? Excluding hermaphrodites, there are ONLY 2 biological choices. Male and Female. Anyone who thinks there are more, that they are different than what they are born as has a mental condition, but that does not change their biological sex. If Jackson can't (or won't) define what a woman is that's a sure indicator of her unfitness for the position that she was just confirmed to. And lets not forget that she ONLY was nominated to that position because she is a black woman and Biden promised that he would nominate a black woman to the supreme court if he was elected. NOT because of her qualifications (which are sketchy at best) but purely for racist reasons.

.

 

[oteps]

I guess its now ok to hire someone based on their sex and skin color.

 

[bgreene]

How in the world could that be a trap? Excluding hermaphrodites, there are ONLY 2 biological choices. Male and Female. Anyone who thinks there are more, that they are different than what they are born as has a mental condition, but that does not change their biological sex. If Jackson can't (or won't) define what a woman is that's a sure indicator of her unfitness for the position that she was just confirmed to. And lets not forget that she ONLY was nominated to that position because she is a black woman and Biden promised that he would nominate a black woman to the supreme court if he was elected. NOT because of her qualifications (which are sketchy at best) but purely for racist reasons.

.

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

 

[scook]

If there’s any doubt, look at DNA. There may be reasons not to treat people “identifying” as as sex, not their own unfairly, but that shouldn’t be a reason to allow genetic males to unfairly compete in women’s sports or have access to women’s private facilities like restrooms and showers where there’s huge potential for abuse.

She dodged the questions and, yes lied, to not give the opposition any talking points that would jeopardize her chances of confirmation. She will now move to a position where she can press her liberal agenda, without regard for the clear limitations of the constitutional language.

 

[bgreene]

If there’s any doubt, look at DNA. There may be reasons not to treat people “identifying” as as sex, not their own unfairly, but that shouldn’t be a reason to allow genetic males to unfairly compete in women’s sports or have access to women’s private facilities like restrooms and showers where there’s huge potential for abuse.

She dodged the questions and, yes lied, to not give the opposition any talking points that would jeopardize her chances of confirmation. She will now move to a position where she can press her liberal agenda, without regard for the clear limitations of the constitutional language.

“ without regard for clear limitations of the constitution “ …..wow that’s not likely fair to state or accurate to assume .
But that’s you’re opinion .

 

[scook]

It’s only sensible to believe that she will try to legislate from the bench as other liberal justices have done and would continue to do if they had the majority.

 

[Destroyer]

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

 

[bgreene]

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

You’re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

 

[Pipe_Dream]

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

You’re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

If you really believe that, then why did you ask him your "serious question?"

 

[bgreene]

If you really believe that, then why did you ask him your "serious question?"

Suddenly pipe here CARES about comment quality …..but NO COMMENTS from pipe when destroyer sent multiple vulgar cursing rants to me .

Same as how violent law breaking mobs behave - such as the trump supporting attackers on our capitol police . Supporting each other’s bad behavior - with excuses .

Me - I’d tell anyone friend, Biden or trump lover what’s right .
Right is right …..wrong is wrong. But trump leads the weak of character to do wrong .

 

[Pipe_Dream]

Suddenly pipe here CARES about comment quality …..but NO COMMENTS from pipe when destroyer sent multiple vulgar cursing rants to me .

I've always cared about comment quality which is why it's so fun to respond to you. So destroyer said something to you once and your responses to him since then are all about attacking him for that post. Yeah boy, that's some quality.

 

[Destroyer]

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

You***8217;re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

You know, I spent a fair amount of time crafting that reply. I *thought* that perhaps you had asked a legitimate question, so I tried to answer it the same way. There were no insults, there was only straight forward scientific facts to answer your question.

So how did you answer my response? Did you show even a hint of civility? Did you even try to respond in kind? No, you did not. You responded with more of your blathering, nonsensical drivel. You didn't even bother to attempt to debate it, you just resorted to your stock in trade, which was to throw personal insults. No wonder the Bass Barn banned you from their site. As I've said before, you have only yourself to blame for that. You have become what is known on the internet as a troll. And for your information, trolls are not welcome on this site.

.

 

[bgreene]

Continued false insults from destroyer .

The fact about bass barn - moderator, intolerant of any posts against trump allowed his pals to post vulgarity that makes yours look tame . Really obscene stuff.
My political data frustrated him to the point that he banned me.

It was so bad on that forum the site ownership company in Canada was investigating multiple reports of the vulgarity allowed from the moderators friends . Bass Barn had very specific guidelines of decency to follow that were ignored .

K Browns record is solid and likely she’ll do a very good job in our Supreme Court.
Trump LIED that she was horribly rude and mean during her hearings - she was nothing of the sort, but professional, and courteous . This is a FACT

 

[Destroyer]

Continued false insults from destroyer .

The fact about bass barn - moderator, intolerant of any posts against trump allowed his pals to post vulgarity that makes yours look tame . Really obscene stuff.
My political data frustrated him to the point that he banned me.

It was so bad on that forum the site ownership company in Canada was investigating multiple reports of the vulgarity allowed from the moderators friends . Bass Barn had very specific guidelines of decency to follow that were ignored .

K Browns record is solid and likely she’ll do a very good job in our Supreme Court.
Trump LIED that she was horribly rude and mean during her hearings - she was nothing of the sort, but professional, and courteous . This is a FACT

False insults? where?

When will you learn that an opinion is not a lie. If President trump said he thought she was rude, etc, that is his opinion and he's entitled to it, in much the same way that you are entitled to yours. Both are exactly that. Opinions. NOT LIES.

.

 

[bgreene]

False insults? where?

When will you learn that an opinion is not a lie. If President trump said he thought she was rude, etc, that is his opinion and he's entitled to it, in much the same way that you are entitled to yours. Both are exactly that. Opinions. NOT LIES.

.

If something is not the truth in any way - then saying the opposite is not an “ opinion “ it’s FACTUALLY WRONG . In this case, Trump slanders Brown .

Also no need to act professorial with the “ when will I learn “ statement.
I call a spade a spade with accuracy .

 

[Destroyer]

If something is not the truth in any way - then saying the opposite is not an “ opinion “ it’s FACTUALLY WRONG . In this case, Trump slanders Brown .

Also no need to act professorial with the “ when will I learn “ statement.
I call a spade a spade with accuracy .

Hmmm... If Trump believes what he said about Jackson how is it not an opinion? It is what he believes. Is he not entitled to his opinions, in much the same way as you or I?

.

 

[scook]

Not true in any way? Her blatant lying about not knowing what a woman is isn’t being disrespectful to her questioners?

 

[bgreene]

Not true in any way? Her blatant lying about not knowing what a woman is isn’t being disrespectful to her questioners?

You’re really reaching here to cover Trumps slander .

 

[scook]

Not at all, I listened to enough of her questioning to agree that she was very poised and seemingly pleasant and responsive, until she lied. I think lying in that setting, as in others, is disrespectful.

You claim to disapprove of lying - you incessantly manufacture (or more accurately, cite your favorite professional far left liars) “Trump lies” and attempt to sell them here.