Trump lies about Ketanji Brown Jackson

B

bgreene

Banned
Anyone watch ANY of Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jacksons hearings ?
Wow notice how cool, calm, and respectful shes taken all questions especially from the likes of Lindsay Graham who repeatedly interrupted her as she answered questions .


Well Trump is absolutely lying about Brown at his rallies - where he COUNTS ON his followers to believe anything he says .
Trump claiming Brown herself was rude - which she absolutely wasnt in any way.

But trump knows many of his followers dont care about FACTS.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7jpt35IUFU4
 
Last edited:
bgreene said:
Anyone watch ANY of Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jacksons hearings ?
Wow notice how cool, calm, and respectful shes taken all questions especially from the likes of Lindsay Graham who repeatedly interrupted her as she answered questions .


Well Trump is absolutely lying about Brown at his rallies - where he COUNTS ON his followers to believe anything he says .
Trump claiming Brown herself was rude - which she absolutely wasnt in any way.

But trump knows many of his followers dont care about FACTS.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7jpt35IUFU4
Click to expand...

I watched almost all of all 3 days. the "grilling" she got from Republicans, was mild at best. They should have taken lessons from the Democrats and tried to destroy her reputation like the Dems did to Kavanaugh. She lied to the entire nation when she said didn't know what a woman was. That's the person that you think should be elected to the Supreme court? No wonder the Country is in such bad shape when idiots applaud people like her.

.
 
Kavanaugh was accused of sexual attack by a specific woman.

Brown is a solid candidate who was in no way rude during the grilling .
 
And we all know that selecting people for important jobs is best done based on skin color and gender.

While it was certainly encouraging that the country was able to elect a person of color as president, confirming that while there’s clearly racism remaining, we are not a racist nation. Unfortunately, he was a very smooth politician but a very bad president, presiding over a huge worsening in race relations and pursuing policies that significantly hindered our much needed economic recovery.
 
scook said:
And we all know that selecting people for important jobs is best done based on skin color and gender.

While it was certainly encouraging that the country was able to elect a person of color as president, confirming that while there’s clearly racism remaining, we are not a racist nation. Unfortunately, he was a very smooth politician but a very bad president, presiding over a huge worsening in race relations and pursuing policies that significantly hindered our much needed economic recovery.
Click to expand...

Wow you didn’t like Obama either hu ?
A very GOOD President
 
Your evaluation of him has to do with his pursuit of things you agree with, well left of center, and that you ignore the destruction he did to our economy and race relations. I’d have thought you would be more concerned with the latter, but as you accuse Trump, he was very smooth and sounded good to his all in followers.
 
scook said:
Your evaluation of him has to do with his pursuit of things you agree with, well left of center, and that you ignore the destruction he did to our economy and race relations. I’d have thought you would be more concerned with the latter, but as you accuse Trump, he was very smooth and sounded good to his all in followers.
Click to expand...

Wrong - Obama started the economy going - after Bush’s fiasco and by the time trump won our economy was doing very well.
And YES Obama was a gentleman .
 
Let’s see - we can’t blame Biden for inflation and his blundering foreign policy, which are clearly his fault, but can blame Bush for something he had little or nothing to do with?
 
scook said:
Let’s see - we can’t blame Biden for inflation and his blundering foreign policy, which are clearly his fault, but can blame Bush for something he had little or nothing to do with?
Click to expand...

Wrong again - Bush had everything to do with the approx $ 1 trillion spent attacking Iraq going after the wrong target after 911. But that’s old news, Bush still a better man than trump will ever be.
 
Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.
 
scook said:
Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.
Click to expand...

It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.
 
bgreene said:
It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.
Click to expand...

But it was President Bush that provided the almost 4 years of intel that finally found Bin Laden and allowed Obama to order the attack.

.
 
I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.
 
scook said:
I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.
Click to expand...

Sadam was found NOT to have weapons of mass destruction .
You agree with destroyer - the only poster of vulgar cursing rants while you pretend to have issue with the slightest return of insult . Hypocrite .
 
Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.
 
scook said:
Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.
Click to expand...

FACTS indicate otherwise scook. FACTS are what I post and some of my own opinions too.

FACTS such as and including :
1. Trump LOST the election by large margin - but LIES that he won.
2. Trump could have but didn’t speak up much sooner against the attack on our Capitol .
3. Bin Laden was behind the 911 attack NOT Sadam - and Dick Chaney lied about Sadam having nucs.
4. You repeatedly posted that you are “ done arguing” but you continue . Hahaha funny.

I’m honest, steady , and fact check rather than believe all the lying cheating dictator loving traitor Trump says . Putin is a murderous tyranny dictator guilty of war crimes and trump loves him and takes his word over our our American intell people.
Disgusting .
 
No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.
 
scook said:
No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.
Click to expand...

Always the insults from the hypocrite who cries about insults .
So now your excuse for returning after posting at least twice that you were done is “ you feel obligated “. Hahaha whatever excuses work for you .
Me …..I don’t make excuses because I don’t have any need to back pedal .
But you go on
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top